Hi all,
To round out my sessions I thought I would provide you with a specific example of an online group-based exercise that I used during the EumetCAL radar course. I hope you find this useful and please give your own specific examples of how you created interaction whilst delivering online training.
EumetCAL radar course workshop: Refer attachment (For general strategies refer to the wiki in Activity 2c ) As an online facilitator (based in Melbourne) of the workshop component of the course which was conducted in Langen, Germany.
I used the attached Powerpoint resource (tables) as the foundation to conduct my first online activity - a group-based exercise.
Prior to the course I organized one of the local trainers to be my eyes and ears (my assistant) at the workshop. We organized the 20 trainees into 5 teams. He was also able to pass the microphone around so that I could communicate with the trainees. My presentation was delivered online to the trainees using Saba Centra as the online synchronous delivery tool and my desktop was projected onto a screen at the workshop.
The teams of trainees were given a particular meteorological Hazard - for example " large hail". Each team was asked to consider what were the fundamental physical processes supporting that hazard; whether there was a conceptual model that applied; what parameters might be used to diagnose the hazard; and how the hazard might be identified in various data and products. In particular, with respect to radar, they were asked to identify what radar signatures were proxies or evidence for the hazard and what other radar products might help in diagnosing and Nowcasting the Hazard.
The teams were given 15 minutes to brainstorm and fill out a paper-based version of the table in slide 2 (refer attachment) table. I actually had an I-phone clock counting down the time and gave them time reminders as they worked through the exercise. The trainees were able to hear the alarm sound when their time was up.
At the end of the 15 minutes the teams were asked to nominate a spokesperson and they had to speak to the wider course about their results. As the spokesperson spoke and the wider group gave comment I completed the table online in front of them (with me at a distance) asking the group whether I had interpreted their comments correctly. We did this for each group and each Hazard.
I then compared the table that they had constructed with my own version that I had constructed prior to the session (refer slide 3 in the attachment) and we discussed similarities and differences.
Cheers - Roger